Again, the conflict between national institute of social security and mutual in relation with occupational disease benefits (now, in procedural area)
Keywords:
Professional illness, Collaborating mutuals, National Institute of Social Security, Financing, Benefits Responsibility, Accident Compensation Fund and Occupational DiseasesAbstract
State Budget Law (2008) amended the Mutual Societies colaboration scope in the management of benefits derived from occupational disease. At first, Mutuas challenged the admnistrative resolutions that imposed them the responsibility for the payment of such benefits for events caused after 1-1-2008 when the worker had not developed after that date activity risk of occupational disease. The Supreme Court jurisprudence (2013) imputing responsibility to the National Institute of Social Security has resulted that Mutual request the return of capital cost constituted for payment, now turning against firm decisions. The question is whether it should apply to mutuals article 71.4 Social Jurisdiction Act.Downloads
219
registered galley accesses
Last 12 months: 75
PDF: 219
· HTML: 0
· Other formats: 0
Article page views
1213
registered views
Last 12 months: 936
History retained by PKP. Accesses are not unique people and do not guarantee a completed download. Data through: 2026-11-05.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2016-07-08
Issue
Section
Estudios Doctrinales
How to Cite
Again, the conflict between national institute of social security and mutual in relation with occupational disease benefits (now, in procedural area). (2016). Revista de Derecho de la Seguridad Social, Laborum, 8. https://revista.laborum.es/index.php/revsegsoc/article/view/111











