Is it mandatory to hire a substitute for a partial retirement hand-over worker who has been suspended from employment and pay? (Commentary regarding the Labour Court Supreme Court Judgement 348/2919 of 9 May)
Keywords:
Appeal for unification of doctrine, Partial retirement, Retirement hand-over worker sanctioned with suspension of employment and salaryAbstract
The technical matter submitted to the supreme court for consideration consists in determining whether or not the company should pay for the partial retirement benefit received by the retiring worker, when the hand-over worker has been suspended from employment and pay without any new employee having been hired to replace them throughout the period of their disciplinary sanction.Downloads
883
registered galley accesses
Last 12 months: 102
PDF: 883
· HTML: 0
· Other formats: 0
Article page views
1670
registered views
Last 12 months: 1296
History retained by PKP. Accesses are not unique people and do not guarantee a completed download. Data through: 2026-11-05.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2020-03-31
Issue
Section
Estudios de Doctrina Judicial
How to Cite
Is it mandatory to hire a substitute for a partial retirement hand-over worker who has been suspended from employment and pay? (Commentary regarding the Labour Court Supreme Court Judgement 348/2919 of 9 May). (2020). Revista de Derecho de la Seguridad Social, Laborum, 22, 141-150. https://revista.laborum.es/index.php/revsegsoc/article/view/398
