Basic and complementary remuneration to be received by members of the Civil Guard in the event of temporary incapacity for service due to psychophysical conditions. Comment on Supreme Court Ruling (Litigation chamber) no. 381/2020, of 4 February
Keywords:
Supplementary pay for specific job type, sick leave, Civil Guard, basic pay, additional salaryAbstract
This paper analyses the doctrine issued by the Contentious-Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court of 4 February 2020, regarding the basic and supplementary remuneration that members of the Civil Guard must receive in the event that they are unable to work temporarily due to psychophysical conditions. More specifically, it will be analysed in relation to the specific, individual job supplement in order to determine which rules should govern the remuneration and thereby identifying the legal rules to be interpreted by the High Court.Downloads
1374
registered galley accesses
Last 12 months: 454
PDF: 1374
· HTML: 0
· Other formats: 0
Article page views
1501
registered views
Last 12 months: 1379
History retained by PKP. Accesses are not unique people and do not guarantee a completed download. Data through: 2026-11-05.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
BLASCO LAHOZ, J.F.: "La protección de asistencia sanitaria, incapacidad temporal e inutilidad en el ámbito de la Seguridad Social de los miembros de las Fuerzas Armadas", Revista Española de Derecho Militar, nº 102, 2014, pp. 129-205.
MARTÍNEZ LUCAS, J.A.: "Régimen especial de las fuerzas armadas", en MONEREO PÉREZ, J.L. (Dir.): Tratado de Derecho de la Seguridad Social. Tomo II, 2017, pp. 697-711.
RODRÍGUEZ ESCANCIANO, S.: "Régimen especial de funcionario civiles del estado", en MONEREO PÉREZ, J.L. (Dir.): Tratado de Derecho de la Seguridad Social. Tomo II, 2017, pp. 679-696.
Downloads
Published
2020-12-21
Issue
Section
Estudios de Doctrina Judicial
How to Cite
Basic and complementary remuneration to be received by members of the Civil Guard in the event of temporary incapacity for service due to psychophysical conditions. Comment on Supreme Court Ruling (Litigation chamber) no. 381/2020, of 4 February. (2020). Revista de Derecho de la Seguridad Social, Laborum, 25, 159-166. https://revista.laborum.es/index.php/revsegsoc/article/view/436
