Is it mandatory to hire a substitute for a partial retirement hand-over worker who has been suspended from employment and pay? (Commentary regarding the Labour Court Supreme Court Judgement 348/2919 of 9 May)

Authors

  • Ángel Arias Domí­nguez Universidad de Extremadura

Keywords:

Appeal for unification of doctrine, Partial retirement, Retirement hand-over worker sanctioned with suspension of employment and salary

Abstract

The technical matter submitted to the supreme court for consideration consists in determining whether or not the company should pay for the partial retirement benefit received by the retiring worker, when the hand-over worker has been suspended from employment and pay without any new employee having been hired to replace them throughout the period of their disciplinary sanction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-31

Issue

Section

Estudios de Doctrina Judicial

How to Cite

Is it mandatory to hire a substitute for a partial retirement hand-over worker who has been suspended from employment and pay? (Commentary regarding the Labour Court Supreme Court Judgement 348/2919 of 9 May). (2020). Revista De Derecho De La Seguridad Social, Laborum, 22, 141-150. https://revista.laborum.es/index.php/revsegsoc/article/view/398

Similar Articles

11-20 of 316

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.